7.2 Connections with appropriate social supports should be facilitated for people with aphasia and their families.
Reference: Attard et al., 2015: Narrative review; Brown et al., 2012: Qualitative meta-synthesis; Hilari, 2011: Non-randomised observational study; Hilari et al., 2021: RCT; Lanyon et al., 2013: Systematic review of 29 studies (12 pre-post test case series, 10 single-case design studies, 4 RCTs, 3 non-randomised controlled trials); Robinson et al., 1999: Non-randomised observational study; Salter et al., 2010: Systematic review of 10 RCTs; Thomas & Lincoln, 2008: Non-randomised observational study.
NHMRC level of Evidence: I
Rationale: The presence of social supports and contacts is essential for individuals facing considerable life changes following a stroke event (Robinson et al., 1999). People with aphasia often report losing friendships (Brown et al., 2012). Developing new friendships can contribute to living successfully with aphasia (Brown et al., 2012), and improvement of available social support may help to prevent social isolation and reduce or prevent the distress and post-stroke depression (Hilari, 2011; Hilari et al., 2021; Salter et al., 2010; Thomas & Lincoln, 2008).
Appropriate supports may include:
● peer befriending services (Hilari et al., 2021).
● community-based groups for people with aphasia and their families. For example,
conversation groups, peer support groups, arts and leisure groups (Attard et al.,
2015; Lanyon et al., 2013),
● Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations (National Aboriginal
Community Controlled Health Organisation, n.d.),
● local and national advocacy organisations (e.g., The AAA),
● aphasia research organisations, and
● university-based aphasia clinics.
![]() | aphasiacre@latrobe.edu.au |
![]() | +61 3 9479 5559 |
![]() | Professor Miranda Rose |